Socialnomics – Social Media Blog

Entries tagged as ‘Tweets’

Everyone is Tweeting, but is anyone listening?

March 27, 2009 · 4 Comments

I just returned from Search Engine Strategies New York and the major topic was Twitter.  Now, this was helped by the fact that the week was kicked off by an energetic opening keynote speech  by Twitter guru, or addict, depending on how you look at it, Guy Kawasaki.  Guy had over 100,000 followers prior to his keynote and now has 94,850, which is very interesting.  You would think the opposite effect would occur.  However, perhaps some thought Guy may have been pushing the line of spamming just a bit.  My sense is that he is not, because, if you don’t like it you can always un-follow Guy.  Unlike e-mail where anyone can spam you, in Twitter you need to be following someone in order to receive messages.

Britney Spears is popular on Twitter

Britney Spears is popular on Twitter

Whether Guy or Brittney Spears or Lance Armstrong  have 94,000 or 550,000 followers, they are A-Listers and people want to hear what they have to say.  It’s not because it’s Twitter, it’s because most of these celebrities previously had a platform.  Now, there will be a few new “A Listers” that result simply from Twitter, these will be few and far between however.  Guy Kawasaki is being helped greatly by Twitter, because he is being aggressively smart.

But, what about the rest of us?  If we have 1,500 followers are any of them really listening?  I’d argue that most are likely not.  However, it is still a huge marketing tool and the nobodies are now the new somebody for the following reason.  Twitter is free.  Hence, if you have 1,500 followers and are a local plumber, most likely most aren’t listening.  However, as long as at least one person is that is all that matters, because of the simple fact that it’s free.  If that one person has a plumbing issue, you as the Plumber now have a shot, especially if you acquired these followers simply by limited your search.twitter.com query to people within a 25 mile radius.

The biggest use right now is 1) big businesses following what is being said about their company – see Zappos, JetBlue, Comcast, etc. 2) Celebrities catering to their following by giving realtime updates – see Lance Armstrong Twitter’s about collarbone 3) Individuals attempt to promote themselves, generate a following and make money

And it’s the last point that may eventually cause Twitter to become Tiresome.  Just like on Facebook you X out the person that is constantly talking about their turtle, bad hair day, etc. on Facebook, the same holds true here.   Is Dale Carnegie rolling over in his grave, because everyone on Twitter is trying to be heard, when the key to winning friends and influencing people is actually listening?

Part of the reason that Twitter is so popular is that some of it’s effectiveness and cool factor is aided by the fact that not everyone is on it.  What could I possibly mean by this?  In January we sent over 6,000 students (via Smithsonian Student Travel) on educational tours to Washington DC for the historic inauguration.  In the past it would have been difficult to get major media outlets attention.  However, it was easy to do with Twitter.  NPR, MSNBC and PBS immediately replied to our tweet, expressing interest in hearing from our middle school student travelers and their teachers.   Now, only two months later.  I’ve #JetBlue about my concern that their TVs may not work for my flight this afternoon and this is crucially important as I booked on JetBlue soley for the reason that I could watch MarchMadness on DirectTV.  My concern was that the TV’s only worked about 50% of the time on this route and could they try to take steps to ensure they would be functioning…instead of hearing tweet, tweet, I heard cricket, cricket.  It was cool when companies and even CEO’s could respond real time, and some still do, but as more and more people join on Twitter that one-to-one will become less and less until the companies can ramp up.  And unfortunately instead of getting a witty and salient reply from a CEO or well-informed employee that took Twittering up with consumers because it was cool, you will most likely get a reply from a call center in New Dehli (should we call them Tweet Centers?).

Now, before I get tons of hate mail, there is a need for micro-blogging tools like Twitter, but it’s somewhere in-between poor e-mail (Google’s Eric Schmidt’s words) and the Greatest Thing ever.  I still tweet, because the upside is still greater than the downside, and oh, by the way please follow me @equalman.

Bookmark and Share

Categories: Twitter
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Trick or Tweet for CNN’s Rick Sanchez

December 1, 2008 · Leave a Comment

CNN anchor Rick Sanchez is an early adopter of harnessing the power of the social graph. Recognizing the huge potential of micro-blogging, Sanchez has become an avid user of the leading technology of the time: Twitter.

Twitter’s main function allows users via various interfaces (Twitter Web site, Twitter modules for iGoogle, Facebook, Yahoo, etc.) to update people who are “following” them on what they’re doing in 140 characters or less. People’s usage ranges from business (“Great article on Southwestern Airlines earnings release can be found here www.motleyfool.com”) to the inane (“Just had my 5th Starbuck’s Pumpkin Spice Venti!”).

By far the most popular way in the beginning for those updating their “tweets” was via their mobile phones. Sanchez decided to test out the new medium.

Obviously some of his activities — “Briefing about Colin Powell interview tonight, just learned that he may announce support for Barack Obama” — are much more interesting than a friend informing you that they’re hopped up on pumpkin-flavored Starbucks. Sanchez was probably pleasantly surprised when, within a few weeks, more than 30,000 people were following what he was “tweeting.”

It’s Not About Me, It’s About Them

He then discovered it was more important to talk less about him and more about them (his followers). From there he started to leverage the Twitter platform to ask thought provoking questions like: “I’m interviewing Colin Powell tonight, what would you like to know most about Iraq or Iran?” Here’s a string of tweets from a debate between McCain and Obama:

…if they twittered they’d know how to make the words fit right? 8:17 PM Oct 15th from web

…like this… put it on joe the plummer, personalize it. way to go mccain 8:11 PM Oct 15th from web

…mccain plan, do you rescue everybody, even guy who paid for house he couldn’t afford. even …flippers? 8:10 PM Oct 15th from web

…ok, i can’t dance. my mother is so ashamed, she can. 3:05 PM Oct 15th from web

…many blaming palin for Mc-palin slide in polls? is that fair? what u think? 12:43 PM Oct 15th from web

…mccain: “doesn’t think i have guts to bring up bill ayers” should he? how should obama respond? this could be fun, showdown ok corral.

The above examples greatly illustrates why social media is so revolutionary. Sanchez is able to have a relationship with 30,000 people — they feel more connected with Sanchez than they did before he started to leverage the Twitter platform. They also feel in responding to Sanchez’s questions that they’re helping to produce the show, which in many ways they are.

Is it Rude Not to Return the Favor?

Sanchez also started following a large percentage (roughly 20,000) of the people following him. How can he follow so many people? He isn’t actually keeping tabs on their tweets unless they related directly to his questions.

He’s following these people as a courtesy. The community etiquette at the time is that if someone is following you then you should probably follow them (they’ll never know if you didn’t read one of their tweets!).

The next progression for Sanchez was to get them on the show. Well, obviously you can’t have 30,000 firemen, carpenters, teachers, and the like on the show. Or can you?

So Sanchez and his producer started asking for their 30,000 followers about what their thoughts were on various subjects and put it up on the general scrolling byline. This was brilliant as it added content to the show and also encouraged the 30,000 to see if their comment made the show!

Companies need to relinquish the total control they’ve had and allow users, consumers, viewers, etc. to take their rightful ownership. Sanchez’s experiment, which turned into an overnight success, can be summed up in the following tweet from his producers.

“just finished editorial meeting with my group, may have great new video today. will share more shortly. like i say, it’s your show.” 9:31 AM Oct 21st from web

The key line in the phrase being, “like i say, it’s your show.” The great thing about technologies like micro-blogging (Twitter, Pownce) for businesses is that tools enable you to type in your brand name like “Hershey” or “Prada” and see what millions are talking about. Good companies do this, but savvy companies take it one step further and act upon it. Which one are you?

Categories: Mirco Blogging
Tagged: ,